How to determine a sport
April 20, 2015
Over my three years as a student at BSM I have participated in many activities. I have also participated in many heated discussions when I mislabeled an activity that contained no physical activity as a “sport.” Activities such as debate, Mock Trial, and speech are commonly controversial; people don’t know how to categorize them. It’s easy to define the term sport as something that contains a physical activity, however even that raises the question of what degree of physical activity would be necessary to call something a sport.
Now this question is something that is continually debated throughout high school, college and in some cases the professional world. We, as people, like to group certain things together and in turn analyze them in groups.
Thus we are constantly searching for the parameters of the word “sport.” I might walk from the parking garage to my cubicle every day, but that doesn’t make me, an office worker, an athlete.
The point is, sorry fellow speechers, speech is not, in fact, a sport. Strictly speaking, speech falls under the category of an activity, and rightly so. This is because of objective versus subjective methods of determining a winner.
If I were to watch a speech round, I might have an idea as to who would come out on top, but there’s no way I could tell for certain who won upon leaving the room; it is completely subjective and opinionated. Soccer, for example, is objective. If a spectator happens upon a few lads kicking a ball around, they can happily (or unhappily) proclaim which side is in fact “winning” over the duration of the game.
Don’t get me wrong though, I’d love to say that everything that is remotely competitive is a sport. It allows certain people (including myself) that are not in any way athletic to claim themselves to be “athletes.”
The only issue with this is the matter of technicality. If we operate on the basis that everything that involves physical movement is a sport, then technically everything we do would be considered a sport. This problem shows us that it really all boils down to how the winner is chosen, whether it is objective or subjective.
Even though certain activities are not classified as “sports” that does not, in fact, devalue the importance of the activities. These activities are just as competitive and valuable for students to participate and succeed in, and can be just as challenging.
Whether or not something is classified as a sport still angers many students. However, regardless of how you feel personally, speech, debate, Mock Trial, and anything else that has a subjective judge, cannot be considered a true sport.
Michael • Aug 28, 2021 at 5:26 pm
I think speech and debate is obviously a sport… Instead of using conventional muscles like legs muscle memory and so on… Speech and debate exercise is the main muscle in our body which is our brain, and comes with trophies that are equivalent if not better than the sports that are generally excepted by high school standards. My daughter was the first to make it to nationals in speech and debate in her high school… She was the first to make it to nationals in anything considered to be nationals in anything considering activities and sports in her high school… Yet she cannot get a leather jacket, she will not be praised by the high school other than a newsletter. Yet her trophy is the only trophy/medal in that schools entirety. She deserves more than just a paragraph in your ridiculous magazine for school… As the brain is the most essential muscle and requires much more discipline than just muscle memory of hitting a ball off of a stick. Jefferson City Missouri is a football town… Oh, excuse me it used to be a football town until they created a second high school… Now the accolades belong to the people that have an IQ more than someone who collects roadkill for a living. The fact that she has not been correctly compensated for her efforts and accolades towards that school is an abomination and the superintendent of the Jefferson city public school district should be ashamed of himself because he is still stuck in the 90s when football was all he can think about and named a damn Stadium after an old coach… This is the New World, brains out way muscles by a metric only Elon musk can describe. If you, and your administration want to be known as being the eighth most powerful sports program in the state… By all means continue you’re stupid, ignorant practice of acting like it is the early 90s… If you want to excel in accolades I suggest you lean more towards the more Brain involved services as opposed to football, basketball ETC…… stop promoting only athletic activities in your newsletter and start promoting your students who are improving your school by academic achievements… Not because they threw a touchdown pass, yet filled basic seventh grade algebra.
Jack Youngblut • Apr 23, 2015 at 10:52 am
OK, so what is a sport? You, Mr. Youngblut, still haven’t actually defined except for eliminating, in your opinion, walking to work. In doing so, you seem to have eliminating the “exercise portion” the sport litmus test. You then state that the difference between a sport and an activity is the fact that in sports one can objectively see who is “winning.” However, in order to see who is winning, you have to have knowledge of the rules, correct? If I believe soccer is won by how many players successfully feign injuries while playing and misunderstand the rules, then I might come to the wrong conclusion as to who is in fact “winning.” Similarly, as a debate judge, I can tell fairly easily, who is “winning” and losing because I know the rules. While it may come down to my judgement who wins and who loses based on my expertise as a judge, that alone doesn’t disqualify an action from being a sport. A better example may be chess, where it is extremely clear who is winning or losing based on the pieces removed from the board by the player’s opponent. Yet chess is not considered a sport despite having “objective” means of scoring the competition.
Many sports have judges—referees. They too, determine the outcome of the game to a certain extent. How many football bros have lost their cool after a referee made an unfavorable call? True, in most cases of speech and debate tournaments there is one judge instead of multiple referees, but that is more so because of a lack of judges and a surplus of contenders rather than the perceived infallibility of the judge. And in high level tournaments in speech and debate, multiple judges are assembled so as to provide better judgment on a whole.
The fact is most things we call sports are not objective 100% of the time and most things we call subjective do in fact have parameters which limit how subjective the ruling is and contribute to the objectivity of the decision.
In closing, Mr. Youngblut, according to your parameters, I can make anything a sport as long as there are rules and those rules are understood by the deciders, the contenders and the audience.
Thanks for this, I’m off blow out my delts at trivia tonight.