The student news site of Benilde-St. Margaret's School in St. Louis Park, MN

Knight Errant

The student news site of Benilde-St. Margaret's School in St. Louis Park, MN

Knight Errant

The student news site of Benilde-St. Margaret's School in St. Louis Park, MN

Knight Errant

Recent tragedies show need for stricter gun control laws

Newtown, Connecticut; Aurora, Colorado, and other gun related incidents represent a morbid but imperative call to action. Gun violence in this country has reached a point where we must act, or risk the pressing consequences. The fact is, this issue cannot be ignored any longer. This country cannot go on without action upon the issue that takes 30,000 lives in the United States each year. Furthermore, we cannot solve this issue with looser regulations. Fighting fire with fire, or in this case fighting guns with guns, will not be effective.

Guns are the problem. Fewer guns equals less gun violence. Basic logic must prevail if Americans are to see that more guns and sloppy laws will never prevent the motives of their use from being impure. The numbers tell the story: the current 238 million guns in civilian hands raise the chances of gun violence.

One potential gun control measure would be the ban of assault weapons. Once banned in the Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, assault weapons are now legal for citizen ownership. Why do Americans feel the need to own an assault rifle? The sole purpose of these weapons is the killing of others, and while self defense is an understandable concern, an AK-47 under your pillow is not only inessential, but ludicrous.

Take a recent incident in China––during the same week as the Newtown tragedy––twenty two school children were stabbed by a man while they sat in their class. Not one of their injuries was fatal. While the crime was no less heinous, the casualties were significantly diminished. Had the gun-wielding killers of Aurora and Newtown not had access to such lethal weapons, their impact would not have been as widespread.

There are other areas of gun control that could lower violence within the United States. Increased mental health screening, pre-purchase education, and reduced permit availability are some less involved examples, while various bans, strict purchase regulations, and the prevention of previous perpetrators of gun violence from obtaining guns are more involved and potent varieties. The bottom line is that without increased gun control, violent and fatal incidents will continue to occur.

Opposers of gun control often argue that criminals and mass murderers obtain guns illegally, making gun control useless. This is not, in fact, true, as 49 of the mass murderers in the United States since 1982 had obtained their guns legally, while only 11 obtained guns illegally. Had those shooters been hindered by gun control regulations, innocent lives could have been saved.

Turning a deaf ear or refusing to “politicise” recent gun related issues is ignorant, callous, and offensive. Action simply must be taken on a political scale. If five of the eleven deadliest mass shootings in United States history have occurred in the years since 2007, we obviously have a growing problem. As a country with rather lenient gun laws, we also have the most mass shootings on the list of the twenty-five worst mass shootings in world history, with fifteen. Ignorance can no longer be bliss.

To put it in simple terms, issues related to gun violence will not go away with mild gun regulations or a complete lack of regulation. In order to preserve our once peaceful nation, stricter gun ordinances are a necessity. We must not ignore, but act. We must not deny, but learn. We can not let such tragedies happen with such a simple solution at hand.

View Comments (2)

Comments (2)

The Knight Errant intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Knight Errant does not allow anonymous comments, and the Knight Errant requires first and last names and a valid email address in order for comments to be published. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.
All Knight Errant Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • J

    Jon PachkofskyDec 20, 2012 at 10:25 pm

    Although I’m in favor of tougher laws against assault rifles and that each and every gun owner should have background checks, psch-evals, and training; fewer guns does not mean less crime in fact it means quite the opposite, as statistics show in states with higher gun ownership violent crime is down.

    The problem is that the people with severe problems are getting a hold of guns and we need to keep them out of their hands. Because the bad element will always have guns is exactly why good people should be allowed to have them for protection.

    Keep in mind that the Right to Bear Arms is to keep the government in check (who are the ones trying to ban guns) and to thwart foreign intervention. A foreign body if consider invading, would not be faced with just our military but 300,000,000 people with rifles,shotguns,and pistols.

    If every gun owner were to go through the process of those people seeking a:” Permit to Carry” most gun problems would be eliminated.

  • M

    Mick HawkinsDec 20, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    We are the greatest nation on the planet! Best form or gov’t, best resources, best educated, best “potentially best” economy,

    People die every day trying to enter our country.

    Why can’t we do what is right for everyone?

    M. Hawkins

Activate Search
The student news site of Benilde-St. Margaret's School in St. Louis Park, MN
Recent tragedies show need for stricter gun control laws